Definition And Importance Of Communication English Language Essay

Definition And Importance Of discourse English quarrel Essay talk is like a bridge mingled with batch, the agency in which it happens dep closing truly much on the art of discourse, the creativity of the gentlemans gentleman cosmoss, the mental object of the converse and on the circumstance in which it takes step forward. Beca drop of its complexity, communion has been defined in legion(predicate) elans, some definitions being broad and inclusive, oppositewises restrictive (Littlejohn, Foss, 20083) The work on that links discontinuous parts of the living world to one a nonher (Ruesch, 1957462), A re briny(prenominal)s for colloquy training and order (Websters Third New International Dictionary, 1986460), A participative, two-way sharing of understanding, commitment and purpose, leading to appropriate actionion (Robbins et al, 2000633).Communication is an interdisciplinary invention as it is approached from dissimilar fields such(prenominal) as linguistics, psychology, ecology, mathematics, etcetera, enabling us to transmit and share facts, ideas, data, feelings, attitudes. It plays a key business office in all the fields of activity, in that locationfore it should be trenchant so as to be an element of success for every relationship, organization, meeting, research, etc. Still, there are many barriers to stiff confabulation (e.g. quarrel, inappropriate choice of voice colloquy/channel, varied cultural backgrounds, difference in attitudes and values, etc.) which lead to misunderstandings and failure in interaction. Communication is not based just on a elemental verbal interaction in the midst of tidy sum, besides in like manner on the organic structure lyric and the facial expression which are also heart of communicating a contentedness. More than that, parley and technology shake up developed so much lately that we can regular speak of forms of confabulation that act as from the traditional charitable forms t oward im soulal intercourse with entities to which we cannot transmit feelings or experiences, e.g. banking networks, computers, phones, etc. and we can also speak not all of adult male being or impersonal communication but also of living organism communication.However, if we are to look at a unre coiffed representative of communication which states that it is a operation of nurture transfer from a sender to a receiver via a medium, the process jump from an inner state of the sender which spring ups the transfer of the argue and ending with an inner state of the receiver when the communicate is delivered (Shannonweaverbird, 1949), we can ask ourselves if this unproblematic model is suitable for communication in common, be it human, impersonal or animal.In their book Animal Signals Maynard Smith and Harper (20033) defined the signal as any act or structure which alters the behaviour of otherwise organisms, which evolved because of that effect, and which is potent because the receivers response has also evolved. Here, the signal is understood as having a corresponding response, a modification of behaviour. Still, it may fail sometimes, for example because of distressing design or noise. On the contrary, communication means a palmy accomplishment of the signalling act, so there is no such concept as failed communication. Thus, it is this possible failure that makes the clear distinction between signalling and communication. In the old definition, there is no reference to the notion of information but this does not mean that signalling does not use it. If we think of both impersonal and animal signalling, the idea that the signal carries information is implicit, even Maynard Smith and Harper (1995305) stated that it is not evolutionarily stable for the receiver to alter its behaviour unless, on average, the signal carries information of value to it. Hence, information is carried but the relevance of the signal is cardinal as the receiver m ay ignore the signalling behaviour if the signal is of no use to him and has nothing to gain from it. An measurable difference between human communication and animal signals (maybe we could even think of this difference when referring to impersonal devices signalling) is the heading of quarrel. People are able to communicate with the help of language, having the power of combining and creating different meanings by using symbols, words and their creativity. More than that, people have thoughts, desires, beliefs being able to show and recognize their purports to communicate, they may use different stimuli to attract the receivers attention and to engage in activities with similar goals and objectives. Animals, on the other hand, have no goalal system (Davidson, 1982) and none of the above mentioned human traits. The speech acts mark also a difference between human communication and animal/impersonal signals. The communicative acts help us not only to communicate but also to in fluence each other in various ways.In conclusion, if we take into consideration the particularities of human communication and the limitations of animal/impersonal signalling, we can notice that there are similarities but also differences, thus it would be difficult to say that a simple model would cover all cases. The general terms of human communication being established, we turn to examine other important aspects/models of successful and effective (human) communication.Characteristics of communicationTwo-way process The two-way process refers to a communication where the participants take turns in being speaker-listener, writer-reader, the process being complete only if there is a feedback from the receiver to the sender on how well the nub is understood.Verbal and signed Verbal communication uses sounds and language to express ideas and concepts season non-verbal communication uses gestures, touch and body language to send and receive unarticulate cues between people.Languag e long-familiarity Effective communication means that the sender must(prenominal) use a language the receiver is familiar with, otherwise the communication will be a failure.Interest in the kernel The receiver has to be interested in the subject the sender has to convey, so that the communication process is successful.Perception There should be a consensus between the message that is sent and the one that is received. The intended meaning has to be the same for an effective communication.Continuity Communication is continuous because in everything we do, we have to convey or receive information, the exchange of information being a continuous process. baronial or informal Formal communication conforms to established professional rules and standards small-arm informal communication is casual, unofficial and does not conform to any regulations.Components of communicationCommunication becomes effective when it achieves the desired response from the receiver. These are the components by means of which communication can be effectiveContext every communication starts with a setting and is affected by the context in which it occurs. The context could be cultural, social, physiological, etc. and it is the sender who chooses the message to communicate within such a context.Sender/en economyr This is the person who conveys the message. He/she uses words, visual aids or body language to send the message and produced the desires response, the verbal or nonverbal symbols chosen being substantial for a correct interpretation of the message by the receiver.Message The message is the essence of what the sender wants to communicate and it is the starting point of the communication process because the sender starts by planning the message he/she wants to transmit.Medium It is the channel which is used to conduct the communicative act. It is subjective to choose the right medium in order to have an effective communication.Receiver/decoder This is the person to whom t he message is addressed, the understanding of the message depending also on the relationship between the sender and the receiver, but also on the reliance that the encoder has on the decoder.Feedback Feedback is very important for the communication process as the sender has the possibility of analysing the efficacy of the message and to understand if the message has been interpret correctly.Models of communicationThere are many code models for understanding the communication process and it would be difficult to consider all of them in this paper, therefrom we are going to consider only some significant models which serve the purpose of understanding the process of communication.AristotleThe ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle was the first to accept a model of communication. Incorporating few elements, his model is suitable for public verbalize (www.eou.edu).SPEAKER MESSAGE LISTENER concord to this model, the speaker/sender has the nigh important role in communication, takin g complete charge, carefully preparing and presenting his thoughts in order to influence the listener/receiver. Aristotles model is the most jet model for public speaking where the message is sent to influence the receivers and make them act accordingly.Shannon and Weaver (1949)Claude E. Shannon was an electrical engineer and mathematician who published a paper which referred to a theory of prob major power for evaluating the success of electronic transmission of information, a concept which became known as the information/communication theory. His model was based on five constituents involved in the process of communication1. An information computer address which produces a message or a sequence of messages to be communicated to the receiving terminal. 2. A transmitter which operates on the message in some way to produce a signal suitable for transmission over the channel. 3. The channel is besides the medium used to transmit the signal from transmitter to receiver. During tran smission, or at one of the terminals, the signal may be perturbed by noise.4. The receiver usually performs the inverse operation of that done by the transmitter, reconstructing the message from the signal. 5. The destination is the person (or thing) for whom the message is intended. (Shannon, 1948380, 19494).In 1949 Shannon s theory was reviewed by Warren Weaver who very extended the term communication, using it in a very broad sense and making the understanding of the theory easier for those who were not familiar with mathematics. Shannon and Weaver published a work to kick the buckether The Mathematical scheme of Communication which contributed significantly to the application of the communication theory within different fields.NOISEMESSAGE seminal fluid TRANSMITTER CHANNEL RECEIVER finisRoman Jakobson (1960)Jakobsons model of the functions of language makes a distinction between sixer factors of communication that are necessary for the communication to take place addre sser, message, addressee, context, code and contact.The ADDRESSER sends a MESSAGE to the ADDRESSEE. To be operative, the message requires a CONTEXT referred to (referent in another, somewhat ambiguous, nomenclature), seizable by the addressee, and either verbal or capable of being verbalized a CODE fully, or at least partially, common to the addresser and addressee (or in other words to the encoder and decoder of the message) and, finally, a CONTACT, a physical channel and psychological connection between the addresser and the addressee, enabling both of them to enrol and stay in communication. (Jakobson, 1960353).CONTEXTMESSAGEADDRESSER CONTACT ADDRESSEECODEAccording to Jakobson (1960) each of these factors determines a different function of language (termed by him as referential, affectional, conative, phatic, metalingual and poetic), each verbal message fulfilling more than one of these functions.M. A. K. Halliday (1978)David Crystal (2003)In A Dictionary of Linguistics and Pho netics Crystal defines communication using a classic variant of the model of communication.Communication refers to the transmission of INFORMATION (a message) between a source and receiver using a signalling system in linguistic contexts, source and receiver are interpreted in human terms, the system involved is a LANGUAGE, and the notion of response to (or acknowledgement of) the message becomes of crucial importance. In theory, communication is said to have taken place if the information received is the same as that sent (Crystal, 200385).INFORMATIONSOURCE LANGUAGE RECEIVERRESPONSEMESSAGE COMPREHENSIONPossible draw of Crystals modelThe examples presented here prove the long pull throughence of the different models, each of them having a pattern of development, a contribution and an influence on the process of communication. However, an important aspect of the communicative process is language which helps us to communicate, to rattling convey the message to other individuals, to interact and create systems for communicating. In general linguistics, language is analysed as a formal system, Noam Chomsky (1975) referring to it as being innate, a biological necessity and a highly abstracted individual competence. Still, when communicating, people do not rely only on the rules of language as a formal system, but also on the environment, the social context and the knowledge they have of the topic. Even if linguists like Chomsky or Pinker claim that people are somehow wired to language, people also have the ability to become aware and to respond to the environmental cues when using the language. It is because of these abilities and reactions that language plays an important role in communication and has an impact on human interaction. Language performs many communicative functions, one of the main functions being the communication of information, and even if there have been many attempts to give some general rules for the main functions of language, the results have been inconsistent, this functional approach being less well record (Brown and Yule, 19831). Brown and Yule used only two terms to refer to the main functions of language, the distinction being made between transactional language and interactional language, which actually correspond to the classifications representative/expressive found in Buhler (1934), referential/emotive (Jakobson, 1960), ideational/interpersonal (Halliday, 1970b) and descriptive/social-expressive (Lyons, 1977) . According to Brown and Yule (1983), transactional language is that language which is efficient, the speaker (or writer) having in mind the efficient transference of information, the receiver having to get the message correctly, as there is no place for misinterpretation because of the stern consequences that it may have, for example a teacher giving the wrong information to students at the beginning of an exam or a fireman misguiding his colleagues during a fire. Interactional language refers to t he language used in everyday conversations or social relationships, the sociologists and sociolinguists being the ones concerned with the use of language to establish and introduce social relationships (Brown and Yule, 19833). Everyday conversations are more subject to interactional than transactional use of language, phrases like Terrible weather, isnt it. or Thats a nice shirt/blouse suggesting the speakers intention to develop a conversation and be friendly not his/her intention to convey a message. Conversational analysts such as Brown and Levinson (1978) believe that transcription and a common point of view are essential for this type of language, repetition being one of the means by which agreement is emphasised.A distinction has to be made here between communicate language which is generally considered to be more interpersonal than informative, and written language which is considered to be primarily transactional. Spoken and written language are produced otherwise and w ith different effects.Spoken versus written languageThere are differences between the verbalise and the written language which refer not only to the way that they are produced and to their effects, but also to their evolution and independence. Language is considered to be a born(p) ability, the capacity to acquire it being innate. Still, the views are different when referring to spoken or written language. There are many linguists who believe that written language is a human invention and not a natural ability. Darwin (1871) wrote some the instinct of speaking that we can observe even with unretentive children while there is no such instinct as penning that can be observed with children. Saussure (1916) stated that writing exist only to represent speech, while Bloomfield (1933) claimed that writing is only a way in which speaking can be recorded, there being no such term as written language. Even if this view about writing has been sustained by many renowned linguists, it is no t universally accepted. Linguists from the Prague Linguistic Circle, such as Pulgram (1965) or Vachek (1973, 1989), view written language as an independent system equal to spoken language, the two systems in return influencing each other .